CODESRIA Catalogue of publications 2016 – 2017

CODESRIA BOOKS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-books” excerpt_length=”0″]

The CODESRIA Publications Programme was designed to disseminate the results and ideas generated by networks of research institutions, seminars, conferences and other scienti c activities. Given that one of CODESRIA’s principal objectives is to promote publications based on research, and given the alarming deterioration of African university presses, this priority has become more urgent and vital than everbefore. The Publications Programme oversees the quality of all CODESRIA publications and appoints editors for journals. CODESRIA publishes in four languages : English, French,Arabic and Portuguese.

Leadership and Crises in Nigerian Universities. Can Women Make a Difference?

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Leadership-and-Crises-in-Nigerian-Universities..zip” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px”]
WORKING PAPER SERIES
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”6″ category=”working-paper-series” excerpt_length=”0″]

Leadership and Crises in Nigerian Universities. Can Women Make a Difference?
Caroline Okumdi Muoghalu, CODESRIA, Dakar, 2018, ISBN: 978-2-86978-759-9

Currently, globalization has made it necessary that universities operate optimally in order to compete effectively globally. In this regard, crises in Nigerian universities constitute a barrier to this goal and to sustainable development. The book-leadership and crises in Nigerian universities: Can women make a difference? is a phenomenal book which was inspired by incessant crises in Nigerian universities. The book discussed the crises in these universities in all its ramifcations. Importantly, in all these discussions, the book traced this problem to men’s autocratic leadership style and established that bringing women into university leadership can actually make a difference in minimizing or eradicating these crises. I describe this book as a book of the moment because as we speak, a lot of crises are going on in universities in Nigeria. As such, providing an alternative leadership model in universities becomes very imperative and this is what this book has achieved. I therefore have no doubt that policy makers, university administrators and other university stakeholders will fnd the book interesting, informative and a great resource in our national and continental march towards building effective and effcient university organization in a globalized world.

Caroline Okumdi Muoghalu holds a PhD from the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. She is a medical sociologist who focuses on HIV/AIDS, gender and health, particularly women’s health and governance issues. She was a research fellow at the Centre for Gender and Social Policy Studies of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria before she joined the Department of Sociology and Anthropology of the same institution. She is an associate lecturer in the Centre for Gender and Social Policy Studies of Obafemi Awolowo University and is an alumna of the Advanced Research Institute of the prestigious Brown University, Rhode Island, USA. Dr Muoghalu has published locally and internationally on urban poor women and governance in Nigeria.

Solusi Top Up Diamond ML yang Aman, Cepat, dan Tanpa Login Akun

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”TÉLÉCHARGER” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/242-1.pdf” padding=”15px 80px 15px 80px”]
WORKING PAPER SERIES
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”6″ category=”working-paper-series” excerpt_length=”0″]

Untuk para pemain Mobile Legends, membeli diamond merupakan bagian penting dalam menunjang permainan. Sayangnya, tidak semua tempat top up menawarkan keamanan dan kemudahan yang cukup. Salah satu layanan yang mulai banyak dilirik karena kepraktisannya adalah warung top up platform yang memungkinkan pengisian diamond tanpa harus masuk ke akun game.

Cukup dengan mencantumkan ID dan server game, diamond bisa langsung dikirim ke akun kamu. Tidak perlu memberikan akses login, yang artinya risiko akun dicuri bisa diminimalkan. Prosesnya pun tergolong cepat banyak pengguna melaporkan diamond masuk hanya dalam hitungan menit setelah pembayaran dikonfirmasi.

Yang membuat warung top up semakin menarik adalah tarifnya yang terjangkau. Bagi pemain yang ingin top up ML murah, layanan ini bisa jadi pilihan utama. Banyak pelanggan setia menyebut bahwa harga yang ditawarkan lebih bersahabat dibanding situs top up lainnya, tanpa mengorbankan kecepatan atau keamanan layanan.

Pilihan metode pembayaran juga jadi nilai plus. Pengguna bebas memilih antara dompet digital seperti OVO dan DANA, pulsa, maupun transfer bank. Ini sangat memudahkan, terutama bagi pelajar atau pengguna yang tidak memiliki akses ke kartu kredit.

Tampilannya pun dibuat sederhana agar siapa saja bisa menggunakannya tanpa kebingungan. Banyak pengguna baru merasa terbantu karena proses pembelian sangat mudah dipahami, bahkan diakses dari perangkat mobile sekalipun.

Bagi kamu yang ingin top up ML murah tanpa ribet dan tetap menjaga keamanan akun, platform ini bisa jadi jawaban. Dengan harga yang kompetitif, sistem transaksi tanpa login, serta dukungan metode pembayaran yang fleksibel, layanan ini patut dipertimbangkan oleh semua gamer Mobile Legends.

International Justice, Reconciliation and Peace in Africa by Charles Chernor Jalloh

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/icj_policybriefn1-02042015.pdf”]
[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/jpi_notedepolitique_n_1-02042015.pdf”]
POLICY BRIEFS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-policy-briefs” excerpt_length=”0″]

IN the context of continuing gross human rights abuses and challenges to peace and security in Africa, international criminal justice has become a subject of much debate in terms of its contributions to ending impunity and contributing to more secure and peaceful societies on the continent. The African Union’s move to create an African court with criminal jurisdiction at its June 2014 Malabo Summit highlights some of the frustrations that many have had with the International Criminal Court, which has not always lived up to the high hopes many invested in it at its birth. This policy brief captures and builds on deliberations during a three-day conference in Dakar, Senegal in July 2014 that was organized by the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa and the Social Science Research Council. It proffers concrete policy recommendations to the AU, to regional economic communities and to states with the hope of contributing to the fashioning of justice structures and processes that seek to end impunity while contributing to the goals of peace, security and reconciliation in Africa.

Quality Assurance in Ghanaian Higher Education Institutions: Opportunities and Constraints

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/242.pdf”]
CODESRIA MONOGRAPHS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-monographs” excerpt_length=”0″]

J. Alabi, G. Alabi, R. Adjei, P. Dzandu, G. Utuka, A. Munkaila. CODESRIA, Dakar, 2018, ISBN: 978-2-86978-788-9.

Quality assurance and relevance of higher education have become critical issues on the global higher education landscape especially in the wake of the need for relevance, accountability and value for money. The commoditisation, privatisation, masssification and new modes of higher education delivery (long distance and virtual modes) as well as trans-national education (TNE) are believed to have triggered concerns about the quality of higher education globally (Mohhamedhai 2008). The commoditisation of higher education by GATS-WTO (2005), require that certain minimum standards be set to facilitate the trading of higher education across countries, to allow for recognition and comparability, while maintaining relevance and functionality. In recent times, academic fraud in different forms, ranging from cheating, to falsification of certificates, to plagiarism and other forms of research and publication misconducts have become major concerns in higher education.

However, it is not clear how leadership, management and governance structures are affecting the quality of higher education particularly in Africa. Alabi and Mba (2012) noted that the key issues necessitating quality assurance interventions include massification, recognition of qualifications across borders, establishing equivalences and other international dimensions of higher education which have made it imperative for some form of standards and quality practices to be deployed at the regional, sub-regional, national and institutional levels.

Africa Development, Volume 32, No 3, 2007

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/africa-development-volume-32-no-3-2007.zip”]
CODESRIA JOURNALS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-journals” excerpt_length=”0″]

Protecting intellectual property rights has become essential in encouraging cutting- edge scholarship that advances the frontiers of knowledge. For a long time, the majority of Africa’s intelligentsia has worked in local and international environments that have exploited the continent’s intellectual capital. Even in contexts where intellectual property rights are enforced, certain constituencies remain at high risk for exploitation. In this paper I use three case studies to argue for a more comprehensive conversation on this issue encompassing intellectuals working in different contexts and with diverse agendas. The first of these involves the unequal power dynamics between individuals working in different kinds of institutions, in this particular case, complicated by the global North/ South divide.

The second explores the dynamics of power in intellectual relationships while the third deals with the challenges emanating from the development and use of endogenous epistemologies in conversation and confrontation with modes of scholarship traditionally privileged in the western(ised) academy. How do we move towards a comprehensive intellectual property rights regime that does not inhibit intellectual freedom of exploration as it protects even the most vulnerable from exploitation? How do we foster a vibrant intellectual environment that is especially nurturing to communities traditionally marginalised within the academy?

Africa Development, Volume 32, No 2, 2007

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/africa-development-volume-32-no-2-2007.zip”]
CODESRIA JOURNALS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-journals” excerpt_length=”0″]

Land is a very important asset and a means to sustain livelihood. In the face of a rapidly growing global population, increase in technological capacity, and affluence, the earth’s land cover has been transformed, especially in developing countries. At the same time, social organisation, attitudes, and values have also undergone profound changes. In contemporary times, issues of sustainable development, pollution prevention, global environmental change and related issues of human-environment interaction have been a major concern globally.

This concern has largely been sparked by the phenomenon of global warming and its consequences, which are threatening the very existence of humans on the surface of the earth. Remotely sensed data (mainly from aerial photographs and satellite images) in combination with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) have been observed to have potential scientific value for the study of population-environment interaction. This paper provides an account of how Remote Sensing, GIS, census (mainly population and agricultural) and socioeconomic (household, district and regional) survey data have been integrated in studying the population land-use/cover nexus in Ghana. It also identifies the major methodological challenges, and solutions.

Africa Development, Volume 31, No 4, 2006

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/africa-development-volume-31-no-4-2006.zip”]
CODESRIA JOURNALS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-journals” excerpt_length=”0″]

In this book, Messay Kebede attempts to unravel the fundamental problems of African philosophy by examining different trends in contemporary African philosophy. Walking us through the terrain of a rapidly growing field of study, Kebede’s book uncovers, widens and enriches our understanding of African philosophy. He notes that European colonialists adopted the hierarchical notions of human races with its blunt promulgation of the superiority of the white race over all other peoples in order to justify slavery and colonialism. He persuasively demonstrates how the idea of the ‘white man’ was an invention, and the mental architecture of the postcolonial African the major cause of underdevelopment in Africa. He has a firm belief that philosophy has a role to play in understanding Africa and decolonising the African mind. According to Kebede,

  • The rethinking of philosophical concepts in the direction of deconstruction for the purpose of achieving mental decolonization teams up modernization with philosophical questions. Nothing can be accomplished in the direction of overcoming marginality unless Africa repositions itself by means of philosophical premises free of Eurocentric conditionings. Decolonization is primarily a philosophical problem, given that the emancipation of the African mind from the debilitating ascendancy of Western episteme is its inaugural moment (p. xii).

Kebede thus makes a strong case for his view that freedom and development presuppose prior decolonisation of the African mind. He believes that decolonisation is unthinkable so long as we endorse Eurocentrism, that is, the conception that there is a unlinear history and that the West is the driving force of that history while other cultures are either lagging behind or frankly inferior or primitive. Mental liberation requires the radical dissipation of Western categories. ‘What comes first is thus subjective liberation, the decolonization of the mind. The gateway to liberation is the prior and complete deconstruction of the mental setup, not the adoption of a revolutionary theory, as African Marxists believed wrongly. Some such dismantling alone is liable to initiate an authentic, unspoiled comprehension of African traditionality’ (Messay 2004:125).

Africa Development, Volume 31, No 3, 2006

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/africa-development-volume-31-no-3-2006.zip”]
CODESRIA JOURNALS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”8″ category=”codesria-journals” excerpt_length=”0″]

As the blurb on its back cover indicates, Globalization and Social Policy in Africa ‘examines the different areas of significant contact between globalization and the lives of ordinary people in Africa’ through the use of ‘empirical and historical studies.’ The book contains fifteen chapters divided into four different parts that specifically address the following: economic and regional trends; poverty and social services provision; globalization, women’s work and citizenship; and higher education and globalization. Published at a time when globalization has become the buzzword for international development, this book adds an important voice to the growing critiques of the whole project of neo-liberal economic models often deemed the panacea for socio-economic development in the global south. Contributors to this volume are aware of the failure of the ‘development’ project fifty years after it was introduced in Africa and other regions of the world.

The trouble with this kind of ‘development,’ as the authors note, is that it is simply another name for economic growth that is devoid of any consideration for the social. It has long been assumed that economic growth will get rid of poverty by creating wealth that in turn will be used to solve social problems. As contributors to the volume show, this has not been the case and the era of globalization (which has come to be associated with economic liberalism), has indeed hurt many African nations and communities. Globalization, for instance, has undermined the legitimacy and power of the state in Africa. Given that for a long time the state has been the primary provider of social services, this globalization agenda of trimming the state has had very negative effects on the lives of the vulnerable majority in Africa. A few examples from the book illustrate this phenomenon.

Analyzing globalization in the Maghreb, Hammouda highlights the tightrope that has to be walked between citizenship and religion where the former allows for a process of secularization that almost undermines the latter. With the push for democratization came the need for the state to relinquish some of its grip and monopoly on politics and a greater focus on individual freedoms that sought to free people from their communal obligations and relations. Thus, a specific Western economic thought has been mobilized as a universal human condition devoid of any historical particularities and shoved down the throats of a culture where religion is inseparable from the everyday. In a related case, Gimode argues that globalization has redefined the role of the state and allowed Islam (which has always sought to step in and redistribute wealth among the poor) to offer social services especially in arid and semiarid areas in Kenya where even government services are hard to deliver.

Africa Development, Volume 31, No 2, 2006

[qodef_button type=”solid” size=”medium” text=”DOWNLOAD” target=”_blank” icon_pack=”” font_weight=”” text_transform=”” padding=”15px 90px 15px 90px” link=”https://codesria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Africa-Development-Volume-31-No-1-2006.zip”]
CODESRIA JOURNALS
[qodef_blog_list type=”standard” number_of_columns=”one” space_between_items=”no” orderby=”date” order=”ASC” image_size=”full” post_info_image=”no” post_info_section=”no” number_of_posts=”3″ category=”codesria-journals” excerpt_length=”0″]

Kane’s seminal work, Muslim Modernity in Postcolonial Nigeria: A Study of the Society for the Removal of Innovation and Reinstatement of Tradition, is a study of the Yan Izala or the Society for the Removal of Innovation and the Reinstatement of Tradition, which is the single largest Islamic reform movement in West Africa. Kane treats Izala as a vehicle for modernity and aims at providing an analytical account of the restructuring of the religious field in Northern Nigeria with Kano as a focus. The Islamic field in Nigeria, like that of West Africa, is uniquely expressive of Sufism- a mode of Islamic devotion. In order to situate the reader into the debate, it is imperative to present an overview of Sufism.

The Sufi mystical tradition is characterized by its reverence of spiritual beings (alive or dead) that are believed to embody extraordinary amounts of baraka, or divine grace. Islamic practice takes the form of membership of religious brotherhoods, tariqa, that are dedicated to marabouts (the founders or current spiritual leaders) of these brotherhoods. Muslims in Nigeria are almost always members of the Qadriyya brotherhood, which is the smallest and oldest, or the Tijaan (Tijaniyya) brotherhood which has the largest following and is spread all over West Africa (Kaba 1974; Miran 1998; Brenner 1988). Sufi Islam is essentially conservative and supportive of the African traditional socio-political order and hierarchical system of class and gender differentiation. Until the 1950s, Sufi orders largely dominated the Northern Nigerian religious sphere and were accepted as the highest form of Islamic orthodoxy and purity (p.150). Kane’s thoroughly researched work is an interesting account of how the traditional Sufi tariqa came under attack from Islamic reformers, particularly the Yan Izala that claim Wahabiyya The Sufi mystical tradition is characterized by its reverence of spiritual beings (alive or dead) that are believed to embody extraordinary amounts of baraka, or divine grace. Islamic practice takes the form of membership of religious brotherhoods, tariqa, that are dedicated to marabouts (the founders or current spiritual leaders) of these brotherhoods. Muslims in Nigeria are almost always members of the Qadriyya brotherhood, which is the smallest and oldest, or the Tijaan (Tijaniyya) brotherhood which has the largest following and is spread all over West Africa (Kaba 1974; Miran 1998; Brenner 1988). Sufi Islam is essentially conservative and supportive of the African traditional socio-political order and hierarchical system of class and gender differentiation. Until the 1950s, Sufi orders largely dominated the Northern Nigerian religious sphere and were accepted as the highest form of Islamic orthodoxy and purity (p.150). Kane’s thoroughly researched work is an interesting account of how the traditional Sufi tariqa came under attack from Islamic reformers, particularly the Yan Izala that claim Wahabiyya

Exit mobile version